Growth and Structural Changes in Employment †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Growth and Structural Changes in Employment. Answer: Introduction: The paper critically discusses the statement The economy of the Peoples Republic of China has reached its Lewisian Turning Point, earlier than expected. In fact, much earlier, and the consequences for China and for the global economy could be tremendous. The model predicts that as the economic growth takes off in the low-income economy, workers shall move from the agricultural sector to industrial sector and a some point referred to the Lewis turning point, surplus labour in agricultural sector shall be depleted leading to sharply surged wages. The determination of the turning point is arrived at via the comparison of marginal product of labour (MPL) and wages in agricultural sector. Research has shown that the national turning of China took place in the year 2006, and hence there is a vast variation in timing of turning point on the regional level (Golley and Meng 2011). Researcher have understood this phenomenon by using the provisional level data in the estimation of the turning point between the years 1996 and 2011. The economy of China could have hit a period of key transformation, as in latest years firm economic forces have been impacting the labour market of China never witnessed. Wages in the manufacturing industry in China in the previous decades have been sharply rising, and in the course of period between 1998 and 2010, the average yearly real wage growth rate stood at 13.80%. Such steady growth in wages has been impacting the cost of production and the competitiveness of China in global market. Simultaneously, reports of shortages in Chinese labour in manufacturing industry have been often with Guangdong province alone being short of 2 million migrant workers in year 2004 (Cai 2010). Such an account aligns to casual observation of managers of the firms. Attraction of labour is increasingly getting difficult unlike in the previous where a queue of workers were waiting for opportunities of jobs, however, presently, it is getting harder for factories to land qualified workers, even if factories are persistently increasing the wages. In the past, abundance of large pool of workers and low costs of production remained the major advantages of economy of China, yet lately, development demonstrate that thing could have altered. A question is posed, is this the eventual state of labour market in China or is it merely a cyclical shortage? Several studies have attempted to present explanation to such a development with some turning to Lewis turning point obtain responses (Fang and Yang 2011). The theory of Lewis turning point was developed in 1954 by Arthur Lewis and examines the correlation between labour supply and wages variations in the course of economic development explained above. The arrival of the Lewisian turning point shall not only decrease the potential growth rate of China, but also have huge adverse impacts on prices, wages, income distribution, economic structure, international trade, government economic policies and direct investment. The Chinese economy is experiencing 2 turning points: 1 from a surge to a plunge in working age and another from underemployment to full employment in Chinese economic development course (Lewisian turning point). This has led to supply of labour shifting from surplus to shortage as seen below: Due to sharp migration of Chinese labour force, especially younger workers, from rural to urban regions, no excess workers in rural areas. The amount of migrant rural residents that left their household registration places hit 159 million in year 2011. The economy of China against this backdrop seems to have hit Lewisian turning point/full employment in process of development. No severe unemployment problem has resulted in the face of the present Chinese economic slowdown compared to past depression. Whereas the real wage growth rate was persistently and substantially lower than growth rate of real GDP till 1997, consequently, this pattern has been upturned as seen below: Rising Wages and Corresponding Impact The shift to labour shortage from labour surplus, shall have serious effects on economy of China via driving up wages. First, share of national income of workers will surge, assisting to decrease the income gap. The shift in labour market to sellers market from buyers market shall not solely culminate in increasing wages, but also enhance rights of workers by lessening working hours as well as accelerating household registration system reforms. Coupled with a decline in rate of unemployment, such enhancement shall account for social stability. Secondly, there will be a contraction in the regional gap. Provided that labour shortage and increasing wages are increasingly evident in coastal regions than in inland regions, the shift of industries from former to later is skyrocketing, especially in labour-intensive industries. Such a shift, is considered a local version of flying geese formation, has culminated in a trend of high growth marred with higher economic growth in inland regions compared to coastal regions right from year 2007. Consequently, the regional disparity that had endured to broaden previously, is currently tightening. Inflationary pressure shall surge. Indeed, when regression analysis is undertaken utilizing data since 1998, with rate of inflation for present quarter (explained variable) and economic growth rate (explanatory variable) for the past three quarters, analyst have reported a strong correlation between the 2 variables. Provided the arrival of Lewisian turning point, China faces an inevitable drop in potential rate of growth. This growth conceptually is constituted by the contribution of expansion of inputs of labour and surge in productivity of labour, and latter is able to be subdivided into expansion of inputs of capital and the surge in total factor productivity (FFP). Such changes in labour market shall become variables that shall restrain contribution of expansion of inputs of labour and those of capital thereby decreasing the potental rate of growth where TFP is constant. Lewisian turning point arrival will limit growth. The labour supply that was unlimited virtually in the previous, has reinforced economic growth in China. First, absorption of excess labour in agricultural sctor by industrial as well as service sectors has been contributing directly to GDP expansion. Secondly, shift of labour force from agriculturla sector along with corresponding low productivity, to industrial and service sectors along with higher productivity, has led to improvement in economy as a whole. The fact that surplus labour has kept wages at the low levels works in favor of cohort with high capital income that consequently culminate in high savings as well as high investment. Yet, the accomplishment of full employment implies that supply of labour to industrial as well as service sector shall drop. Together with a drop in rate of saving this will culminate in a drop in rate of potential growth (Huang and Jiang, 2010). Clear proof of already declined Chinese potential growth rate exists. The latest divergence between comparatively high rati of jon-offers-to-seekers denoting balance between supply and demand in market for labour alongside the comparatively low economic rate of growth are typical signs. The more rate of growth surpasses (fall short of) the rate of potential growth, the higher (or lower) is the ratio of job-offers-to-seekers sinnce the balance between supply of labor and demand for labour tightens (loosens). Where potential growth rate is fixed, a lower rate of growth need to drop the ratio of job-offers-to-job-seekers since the balance between supply of labour and demand for labour loosens in market for labour. Nevertheless, where potential rate of growth further drops together with real rate of growth, ratio of job-offers-to-seekers must stay high as it is currently, since the balance between supply of labour and demand for it does not broaden as seen below: Economic Development Trend Shift Whereas the Lewisian arrival imply that quantitative expansion of factor of production including labour and capital-growth drive will be challenging, it further mean that China shall be freed from the limitation of the need to create a huge quantity of jobs. Chinese GDP growth rate hit 10.40% per year between 1991 and 2011 whereas Chinese employment rate of growth stood at merely 0.8 percent (Fang, Yang and Meiyan 2009). The co-existence of high rate of economic growth and low growth in employment is referred to as jobless growth in China. Many economists recognize this phenomenon as a severe economic problem. Chinese government has been putting priority on labour-intensive industries development to secure employment. Nevertheless, the fact that Gross Domestic Product, denoting output, has growth by 10.40% yearly, whereas employment, denoting input of labour, has surged by merely 0.80% per year implies that yearly growth in productivity of labour has hit 9.60%, substantially accounting for economic growth. From this viewpoint, jobless growth is representable as the growth in absence of job growth or growth via increase in productivity of labour (Minami and Ma 2010). In case of full employment achievement (Lewisian turning point), growth from expanding employment would be increasingly foolhardy, if not unfeasible, subsequently, a surge in labour productivity-an increase in TFP especially-shall be most significant aspect to back rate of economic growth (Fang 2007). The government of China against such backdrop, has commenced to make top preference of its economic policy shift in economic development trend, mainly from growth on the basis of expansion of inputs to growth in terms of higher productivity, rather than emphasizing on creating jobs as in it did previously. The government is encouraging native innovation by Chinese firms to improve productivity. The government such 7 strategic emerging industries as regions on cultivating as energy conservation and environmental protection; next-generation info technology; biotechnology; high-end equipment manufacturing; new energies; new energy automobiles. Both government policies and market forces are presently encouraging shifts in economic development trend. Due to increasing wages linked to labour shortage, Chinese firms must work on investments in saving labour as well as cultivate novel business regions to improve competitiveness. On the basis of such efforts of Chinese government and firms, China is upgrading its structure for industries through the movement of resources out of the industries that are labour-intensive to those of higher value addition ones. This accounts for Chinas recognition as the global largest producer of automobiles as well as crude steel, the economys manufacturing industry has been shifting from light industries to heavy ones. Impact on Global Economy Provided that China is the global largest exporting economy and 2nd largest importing economy, the sharp changes in Chinese labour market and the subsequent shift in its economic development trend shall further have a substantial tremendous consequences/impacts on the global economy. First, in the international trade, such changes shall change the comparative prices of products and hence the Terms of Trade (ToT) (the relative price of exports to imports) of global economies engaged via changes in the exports and import structures of China (Cai 2008). China has been surging its exports of labour-intensive commodities, making use of comparative advantage of the countrys abundant labour force, whereas importing capital-and technology-intensive commodities like machinery as well as components from overseas. In this course, the ToT of China deteriorated in terms of declining prices for exported goods and increasing prices for imported goods whereas those of Chinas trading partners improved. This implies that China in essence transferred income to the trading partners. Yet, as labour moves to shortage from surplus, the comparative advantage of China is shifting to capital-and technology- intensive products from labour-intensive products. As the economys import of capital- and technology-intensive products shall be substituted by goods locally manufactured, whereas Chinas exports of labour-intensive products shall be curbed, both labour-intensive products supply and demand for capital-and technology-intensive products will decrease in the global market. As a consequent, the comparative price of labour-intensive products to the capital-and technology-intensive products shall increase, and, consequently, the ToT of China will improve. Whereas such a change in comparative prices shall be beneficial for the developing economies which primarily export labour-intensive products and import capital-and technology-intensive products, the developed economies which mainly export the latter and import the former shall be greatly hurt. Simultaneously, with respect to direct investment, the alteration in the comparative advantage of China is facilitating the shift overseas of labour-intensive products because of increasing wages and high rate of exchange (Cai and Wang 2010). The Chinas industrial restructuring that requires a large-scale factories relocation past its national boundaries, shall provide a golden opportunity for Southeast Asian economies and emerging economies like India with low cost of wages to accelerate their respective industrialization on the basis of inflow of direct investment. In ten years, products manufactured in China which are on shelves of one-hundred-yen shops in Japan, for example, could extinguish and be substituted by products in such other economies. Conclusion Detailed understanding of the Lewisian turning point model and the associated impacts on both Chinese economy and other global economies have been presented. China hit the full employment in 2006 and this has not only had negative effects in China but the spillages are being felt in other trading partners economies. References Cai, F. and Wang, M., 2010. Growth and structural changes in employment in transition China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 38(1), pp.71-81. Cai, F., 2008. Approaching a triumphal span: How far is China towards its Lewisian turning point? (No. 2008/09). Research Paper, UNU-WIDER, United Nations University (UNU). Cai, F., 2010. Demographic transition, demographic dividend, and Lewis turning point in China. China Economic Journal, 3(2), pp.107-119. Fang, C., 2007. Growth and Structural Changes in Employment in Transitional China [J]. Economic Research Journal, 7, pp.4-14. Fang, C., 2010. Demographic Transition, Demographic Dividend, and Lewis Turning Point in China [J]. Economic Research Journal, 4, pp.4-13. Fang, C., Yang, D. and Meiyan, W., 2009. Migration and labor mobility in China. Fang, C.A.I. and Yang, D.U., 2011. Wage increases, wage convergence, and the Lewis turning point in China. China economic review, 22(4), pp.601-610. Golley, J. and Meng, X., 2011. Has China run out of surplus labour?. China Economic Review, 22(4), pp.555-572. Huang, Y. and Jiang, T., 2010. What does the Lewis turning point mean for China? A computable general equilibrium analysis. China Economic Journal, 3(2), pp.191-207. Minami, R. and Ma, X., 2010. The Lewis turning point of Chinese economy: Comparison with Japanese experience. China Economic Journal, 3(2), pp.163-179.